How to Find Out if Your Local Police Officer Is an Informational Text Definition Source FourFourThree
“When you hear of an officer being tagged in an Informative Text, you can immediately check whether your local police officer is an Informatory Text Definition,” said Alexei V. Bode, the Director of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Justice.
The OIG, in its recent report, identified Informational text as a form of police surveillance, that is, it is used to gather information about the conduct of law enforcement personnel.
“The OIG recommends that agencies adopt a practice of identifying all officers who have been tagged in the Informative text definition by the OIG,” the report stated.
The definition can be found on the Federal Bureau of Investigation website.
“Informational texts can be used to obtain information about law enforcement activities, such as the type of firearm used, who is involved, and their relationship to each other, as well as to gather evidence about an investigation,” the FBI website states.
Informational texts have also been found in several states, including New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Texas.
Informative texts can also be used in investigations involving the use of force and the use or threatened use of deadly force, the FBI states.
The FBI’s website also explains that officers in some jurisdictions can be tracked by the use and/or receipt of a document called an Informatic Text Report.
Informatic texts are also often used by law enforcement to gather intelligence about the activities of others.
“Officers who receive an Informant text are tracked and identified by their IP address, location, or other identifying information, making it very difficult for them to leave the area without detection,” the Federal Government website states, explaining that the use is illegal.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics found that in 2017, there were 2,879,927 InformationalTexts collected from law enforcement agencies nationwide.
In a recent survey conducted by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), nearly 60 percent of respondents said they would consider reporting a police officer for being an Informanet definition.
“We’re really concerned about what is happening in our country right now,” said Adam Schwartz, an attorney at the ACLU.
“What happens when the FBI starts collecting this information about officers, and what happens when it is distributed, and if it can be shared with law enforcement?”
The FBI said it is currently analyzing the data to determine if the FBI’s use of Informationaltexts has any impact on public safety.
However, the agency said that, “It is also possible that it is not, because of the broad scope of the data that is being collected and the way that it has been collected.”
The FBI is also developing a pilot program that will test whether or not it can identify and stop the spread of the Informanttext, the bureau said.
If the pilot program proves successful, the federal government will create a system that will track and stop all InformantTexts that are collected.
“At this point, we believe it is more likely that the FBI is simply using the data as a tool to better target their investigations,” Schwartz said.
“But it’s also important to remember that the goal of the FBI isn’t to identify all individuals in the United States who may have been involved in any way in any investigation.”